Online safety & content laws in Afghanistan (2026)
Online safety rules in Afghanistan: heavy restriction.
Afghanistan under Taliban rule operates no consumer-protection or online-safety framework comparable to the EU DSA or UK OSA. Internet access is instead controlled through morality-based decrees by supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, which have produced repeated shutdowns, platform blocks, and, as of May 2026, orders to sever residential fibre-optic services in Kabul. The regime's approach is one of state suppression rather than safety regulation.
Legal framework
Taliban supreme-leader decrees enforced via the Afghanistan Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (ATRA) and Ministry of Communications & IT; no formal online-safety statute exists
Key points: internet & online safety in Afghanistan
Supreme-leader morality decrees as primary control mechanism
On 15 September 2025 Hibatullah Akhundzada issued a decree banning fibre-optic and WiFi services in Balkh, Kandahar, Uruzgan, Zabul and Nimruz provinces to 'prevent immorality', with stated intent to extend the ban nationwide. No legislative process or independent oversight applies.
Nationwide internet shutdown, September-October 2025
On 29 September 2025 Taliban authorities imposed a nationwide telecommunications blackout; Cloudflare and NetBlocks recorded less than 1% of normal traffic. Services were restored on 1 October 2025 without explanation, but targeted social-media restrictions (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat) followed on 7 October.
May 2026 order to cut residential fibre in Kabul
ATRA summoned internet providers in May 2026 and, on orders attributed to Mullah Abdul Ahad Fazli (appointed by Akhundzada specifically to tighten restrictions), directed them to disconnect residential fibre-optic services across the capital, threatening hundreds of jobs if implemented.
Virtue and Vice Law restricts digital content
ATRA surveillance mandate; no independent regulator
ATRA, now folded into the Taliban Ministry of Communications & IT, is empowered to compel operators to monitor and hand over traffic data for 'harassing, offensive, or illegal' communications and national-security cases, with no judicial warrant requirement. It functions as an instrument of state control rather than an independent regulatory body.
UN condemnation; no age-verification or platform-liability rules
Sources
- ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/10/afghanistan-new-restrictions-telecommunicat
- amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/09/afghanistan-taliban-de-facto-authorities-must-
- blog.cloudflare.com/nationwide-internet-shutdown-in-afghanistan/
- hrw.org/news/2025/10/01/afghanistan-internet-shutdowns-imperil-rights
- rferl.org/a/taliban-restricting-social-media-afghanistan-internet-blackout/3355
- afintl.com/en/202605112124
- atlaspress.news/en/2026/05/16/taliban-orders-fiber-optic-internet-cut-kabul/
- rsf.org/en/afghanistan-disturbing-escalating-censorship-suffocating-free-pres
- atra.gov.af/
- mcit.gov.af/en
Next for Afghanistan: CybersecuritySectoral rules
Next topicOrientation, not legal advice: verify against the primary sources linked above. Last verified 24 May 2026. Methodology & how to cite · State of Technology Regulation 2026